From the original comment on the ExAblate (MRgFUS) procedure:
Ruth: I’ve been investigating ExAblate as a potential candidate for over a year now, and finally had my consult at Virtua in NJ, with a 2nd opinion at Weill-Cornell in NYC. I really want to hear from anyone who has had this procedure…
Other comments: (Click the link to view the whole comment or the off-site link for more info.)
aiyin: Here’s an alternative procedure for zapping those pesky uterine fibroids. Unfortunately, it is so new my gynecologist never heard of it … http://www.universitymri.com/imageguided/fus_faq.html
Ellen: I am hoping that I will be eligible. Three SEDATED hours in an MRI, belly-down, while they blast the fibroids with ultrasound.
aiyin: Here’s more about ExAblate:
http://www.uterine-fibroids.org/index.html
The Related Post at the bottom contains information I gathered from a TIME magazine article as well as a few links to the ExAblate (MRgFUS) site.
[Edited to add the ExAblate toll-free number (US): 1 866 EXABLATE (1 866 392 2528). Thanks Randee!]
Leave a comment if you have an ExAblate experience (pre- or post-treatment), questions, or thoughts.
——————–
Related Posts:
New treatment uses sound waves to shrink uterine fibroid tumors
ExAblate 2000 (MRgFUS) non-invasive fibroid treatment receives two new associated approvals by the FDA
January 2, 2010 at 11:40 am
Hi CJ, please tell us more about LESS. I couldn’t find anything but I guess I’m using the wrong search terms. I’m glad I had the hysterectomy … I had a great surgeon, quick surgery, easy recovery. But not everyone will be so lucky and I’d always recommend the least invasive option possible. Please let us know how your appt goes next week. Hang in there, sister!
January 12, 2010 at 2:57 pm
If you want to find more about Used Ultrasound Machines, go to,
January 14, 2010 at 6:25 pm
I’m an Australian living in London and these are my experiences with MRgFUS in Melbourne, Australia and St Mary’s, London.
Had ultrasound in the UK just prior to going back to Melbourne for a 2 week visit which showed multiple fibroids throughout. Saw an OBG/GYN in Malvern who said only options were hysterectomy or ‘do nothing’. Any other approaches such as myomectomy or embolization she said were not recommended which left me extremely distraught.
Looking for more information I went to the women’s health information centre at RWH in Flemington, they were mortified at the lack of help provided by this first (female) doctor and assisted in provideing names of more knowledgeable gynae specialists for a 2nd opinion. The 2nd doctor was an infertility & laparoscopic specialist. She arranged a referral for a staging MRI to see if I was suitable for MRgFUS which I was able to get done privately the next week.
The MRI showed at least 8 focal typical T2 fibroids scattered throughout the myometrium. The largest being intermural in the fundal region measuring 8.2 x 9.4 x 4.3. Others are: 5.4 x 3.8 x 4.3 left lateral intermural, 4.3 x 5.2 x 3.6 anterofundal intermural, 2 x 1.4 cm in mid to lower body of uterus, and 4.6 cm in the lower body. Uterus is markedly enlarged with a volume of 821cc
The IR advised that I was not currently suitable for MRgFUS as the dominant fibroid abuts the sacral promontory (risk of nerve damage), however recommended a course of GNRH agonist for 3 months when it is probable that I will be likely to be suitable for MRgFUS.
I then returned to London and decided to look into seeing having the MRgFUS at St Mary’s in Paddington. It’s more expensive for the procedure £4,400 vs. ~AU$5,500 but easier to coordinate rather than needing to time GNRH agonist injections around when I could book the re-assessment MRI in Melbourne, time off work etc.
I saw the gynae at St Mary’s then had to wait to get my films reviewed by the radiologists. The Dr told me though that 6 is the maximum number they like to treat due to the amount of time on the table to do more (I have at least 8). Also the beam is only affective apparently to a depth of 12cm and she was concerned that the one at the back might be too far away. They can apparently try things like filling your bowel with air to see if it can move forward enough so that was what I was waiting to find out from the MRI review.
Well the feedback was that I was suitable to have the MRgFUS to the St Mary’s criteria and no need for the GNRH agonist to shrink them first which was even better news. However due to the limitation in the number that they would treat plus the fact MRgFUS may only reduce the volume by 35% and symptoms by 70% I decided I’d investigate surgical options.
I’ve now had a hysteroscopy with polyp removal (see post on how are you feeling after hysteroscopic myomectomy) and am due to have a laproscopic myomentomy on January 25.
January 18, 2010 at 5:59 am
Annette – thanks for a great example of thoroughly researching your options and not taking “no” for an answer!! It really helps us all to remember that we can take more charge of our health.
Best to you!
January 17, 2010 at 2:13 am
Very, very nice post and a great site design. Kudos to the site admin. Hard to find quality sites anymore especially on this topic, I’ve bookmarked and signed up for your feed.
February 6, 2010 at 2:57 pm
Hi ladies,
Found something that may of interest to anyone in the US who’s considering treatment and hopes for pregnancy after. There are currently trials about this which you can join, check it out at
http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00730886
Hope that’s of use to some one. x
March 12, 2010 at 3:22 pm
Here is info about LESS in the Baltimore area –
LESS Procedures:
LESS is an advanced minimally invasive approach in which the surgeon operates almost exclusively through a single entry point, typically, the patient’s navel. Potential advantages of LESS include better cosmetic results from a hidden scar at the base of the belly button (this surgical approach is called “scarless surgery” because patients can’t see the incision at the base of the belly button once it has healed), less pain after surgery resulting in the need to use less pain medication, and quicker recovery from fewer incisions.
Dr. Amanda Nickles Fader, M.D. a gynecologic oncologist and minimally invasive surgeon at GBMC, is one of only a handful of gynecologic surgeons in the country trained in LESS procedures. This minimally invasive innovation has recently garnered significant interest across many medical fields, including urology, general surgery, colorectal surgery and gynecology. It remains one of the hottest topics in contemporary minimally invasive surgical research.
Over the last year, Dr. Fader and her colleagues at the Cleveland Clinic have published some of the first studies on the use of single port surgery for gynecologic procedures and have demonstrated that this surgical approach is safe and effective when used to treat a variety of gynecologic conditions including fibroids, endometriosis, pelvic pain, ovarian cysts and pelvic masses. As a gynecologic oncologist, a surgeon who specializes in treatment of precancerous and cancerous female diseases, Dr. Fader has focused her studies on utilizing LESS for women with precancerous conditions like cervical dysplasia, those with pelvic masses or large ovarian cysts, those women at high risk for ovarian cancer who may want their ovaries removed prophylactically to prevent cancer, and for surgeries to treat some early-stage endometrial and ovarian cancers.
Dr. Fader said, “In our first group of published studies, our preliminary data demonstrates that women who undergo single incision laparoscopies use little to no pain medicine after surgery, recover very quickly and are quite satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes because most women can’t see their hidden surgical at the base of the belly button.”